Chandigarh, October 27 (Paigam-e-Jagat)- At the behest of former minister of Punjab Surjit Singh Rakhra, a case of vandalizing the Harman Milk Food Company located in Patdan Road Samana and cutting down and selling 2 crore trees in the area has come to light. has come The company's director chairperson Rachna Garg has filed a petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court, demanding life protection, stating that there is a threat to his life and that of his family. , who have helped Rakhra in this work.
High Court Justice Sandeep Modgill, while hearing the case, after seeing all the documents and evidence and hearing the arguments of Advocate Amar Vived, showing seriousness, Punjab Home Secretary, DGP, DC. Patiala, SSP, Commissioner of Municipal Corporation Samana and other concerned officials have been ordered to ensure the safety of the life and property of the petitioner. The court has appointed Advocate Rajiv Godara as the local commissioner after seeing the seriousness of the case. , who will visit Harman Milkfood Company on Friday and take stock of the vandalism and the condition inside. After Godara's report, the court will hear the case on November 3.
Advocate Amar Vived demanded to provide security to Advocate Rajeev Godara who was appointed as Local Commission during his visit, upon which the court directed Punjab Advocate General Gurminder Singh to ensure security during the visit of the Local Commissioner and till the hearing. Orders have been given. In Harman Milkfood, Rachna Garg and her husband Ravinder Garg are 70 percent shareholders, the rest are government shares. Ex-minister Surjit Singh Rakhra has been accused in the petition that a person named Virsa Singh Sidhu, under his influence, forcibly entered the factory with the help of 30-40 Gurgas and stopped the directors and employees from working. The court has written in the interim orders issued on Thursday that Virsa Singh Sidhu is a vicious criminal, who has been declared a fugitive by the court, and who is being investigated in several criminal cases. The previously appointed local commissioner and advocate Amar Vived went to inspect the factory, but the unidentified people present there did not allow them to enter. The court said that pressure was being put on the petitioner on the basis of political bribery and power. Attempts are being made to forcibly occupy the property, but those who have the responsibility to prevent it remain silent spectators, which cannot be ignored.